This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
libstdc++/9066: docs for char_traits template not having an implementation
- From: 158988 at bugs dot debian dot org
- To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Dec 2002 15:58:14 -0000
- Subject: libstdc++/9066: docs for char_traits template not having an implementation
- Reply-to: 158988 at bugs dot debian dot org
>Number: 9066
>Category: libstdc++
>Synopsis: docs for char_traits template not having an implementation
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Fri Dec 27 08:06:00 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: 158988@bugs.debian.org
>Release: 3.2 branch
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
[from http://bugs.debian.org/158988]
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 04:07:36PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 02:17:45PM +0200, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> > This
> > is very annoying as you need to fill in all the gory details if you want
> > to have a string of something else (like string<size_t> to hold a list
>
> Well, yeah. "all the gory details" /depend/ on the type you choose;
> they cannot be guessed by a default implementation.
I should add that the recent August archives of the libstdc++ list
(gcc.gnu.org) have examples of how to do the gory details. They will
be formalized into note in the online docs as soon as someone (read: me)
has the time, and possibly may be coded into an <ext/something> header.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: