Re: c++/7748: Static objects in dynamic library with non-defaultpriority not initialized

[Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>]

The following reply was made to PR c++/7748; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: bangerth@dealii.org, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, <jrheath@ca.ibm.com>,
   <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/7748: Static objects in dynamic library with non-default
 priority not initialized
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:02:23 -0600 (CST)

 On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
 
 > On 20 Dec 2002 bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 > 
 > > Synopsis: Static objects in dynamic library with non-default priority not initialized
 > > 
 > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->jsm28
 > 
 > I don't even know what code you're talking about.  If cvs annotate has
 > indicated the last change to it was some global change such as spelling
 > fixes or table-driven attributes, you need to find someone who has
 > actually worked on that code locally.
 
 Sorry for finger-pointing you.
 
 I'm talking about the SUPPORTS_INIT_PRIORITY flag which is used in 
 cp/tree.c(handle_init_priority_attribute). The ChangeLogs are not quite 
 verbose about this, and you "own" the function almost entirely in cvs 
 annotate. But you're right, in the ChangeLog this appears as a bulk change 
 for table-driven attributes, sorry.
 
 There are some blank lines which refer to Jason's 1.106 checkin. I'll move 
 responsibility to him soon, to see whether he's the right person.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:           bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth