This is the mail archive of the gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: optimization/8994: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE with -O -march=pentium4


The following reply was made to PR optimization/8994; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Torbjorn Wassberg <Torbjorn.Wassberg.8667@student.uu.se>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, torbjorn.wassberg.8667@student.uu.se,
	gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/8994: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE with -O -march=pentium4
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:37:57 +0100 (CET)

 Quoting bangerth@dealii.org:
 
 > Old Synopsis: ICE with -O -march=pentium4
 > New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE with -O -march=pentium4
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 > State-Changed-By: bangerth
 > State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 18 12:23:22 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     Confirmed. It's a regression: it works in 3.0.4, but fails
 >     with 3.2 and 3.3. It should not ICE, but it is worth
 >     mentioning that it prints this:
 >       x.c:12: warning: deprecated use of label at end of compound
 > statement
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8994
 > 
 It should not matter as the original source (~3000 lines) doesn't have this problem.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]