This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: target/7493: [SPRAC] Possible instruction jump too large for assembler.
- From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 10 Dec 2002 17:46:03 -0000
- Subject: Re: target/7493: [SPRAC] Possible instruction jump too large for assembler.
- Reply-to: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de>
The following reply was made to PR target/7493; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
To: Marcus MacWilliam <marcusma@lsl.co.uk>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/7493: [SPRAC] Possible instruction jump too large for assembler.
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 18:39:22 +0100
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:28:19PM +0000, Marcus MacWilliam wrote:
> I was using gcc v3.1, when the error occured.
> The assembler code produced, was contained in the original defect.
> The original error message was included in the defect.
> The error is there.
>
> However, we re-wrote the function to be smaller, to get rid of the
> problem, so it is not as much of an issue now, as it was then.
I'm still interested in a test case for this but unless you're
able to provide us with C-Code that triggers the problem noone can
help you. Maybe you can invest some time and produce a modified/stipped down
version of the original code that still triggers the bug.
If you can't provide a test case I'll have to close this report.
regards Christian
--
THAT'S ALL FOLKS!