Re: c++/8702: [3.3 regression] matching of conversion operators

[Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at attbi dot com>]

The following reply was made to PR c++/8702; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/8702: [3.3 regression] matching of conversion operators
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:47:47 -0500

 On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 05:15:54PM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 >     True. It's a regression on mainline. Here's a reduced
 >     testcase:
 >     ------------------------------------
 >     template <typename X> struct C1{};
 >     
 >     template <typename X>
 >     struct C2 {
 >         template<typename Y> operator C1<Y>();
 >         template<typename Y> operator C2<Y>();
 >     };
 >     
 >     
 >     template<typename X> template<typename Y>
 >     C2<X>::operator C1<Y>()
 >     {
 >       return C1<Y>();
 >     }
 >     ---------------------------------
 
 That's a very good testcase.  It isolates the problem well.
 Can you prepare a patch to add this to the GCC testsuite?
 I think it should go under: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/
 If you prefer, I can create a patch and submit it to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org.
 
 Thanks.
 --
 Craig Rodrigues        
 http://www.gis.net/~craigr    
 rodrigc@attbi.com