This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/7400: segfault with -shared option
- From: David Jung <jungdl at ornl dot gov>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 31 Oct 2002 15:16:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/7400: segfault with -shared option
- Reply-to: David Jung <jungdl at ornl dot gov>
The following reply was made to PR c++/7400; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Jung <jungdl@ornl.gov>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
nobody@gcc.gnu.org, t6@pobox.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/7400: segfault with -shared option
Date: 31 Oct 2002 10:18:46 -0500
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view audit-trail
Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> wrote:
> Huh? With -shared you create a shared library. You can't run a shared
> lib. So getting a SEGV isn't wrong.
Yep. You're right. My original problem was not in trying to
run a shared lib, but in my effort to reduce the problem report
to the minimum reproducible code, I obviously got a bit
overzealous. Sorry about that.
I don't know if my original problem is fixed in 3.2, as the code
was redesigned to eliminate the dynamic_casts that were causing
the problem.
So I guess you can close it. If I come across it again I'll reopen
or post another report.
Thanks.