This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
bootstrap/8151: GCC 3.2 fails to bootstrap with glib 2.3
- From: casteyde dot christian at free dot fr
- To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Oct 2002 09:45:19 -0000
- Subject: bootstrap/8151: GCC 3.2 fails to bootstrap with glib 2.3
- Reply-to: casteyde dot christian at free dot fr
>Number: 8151
>Category: bootstrap
>Synopsis: GCC 3.2 fails to bootstrap with glib 2.3
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Sat Oct 05 02:46:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: casteyde.christian@free.fr
>Release: 3.2
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
Linux 2.4.19/glibc 2.3/make 3.80/binutils 2.13
(test of integration)
Actually, gcc did compile itself, but failed to build the libstdc++. Failure was "unknown __newlocale" in libstdc++ build, certainly due to glibc 2.3 header change.
Quite difficult to find stable couple of glibc/gcc that compiles each other: glibc 2.2.5 fails with gcc 3.2 (since 3.1.1 actually), glibc 2.2.6 would but is not out, glibc 2.3 succeeded but broke gcc now. Hence it would be nice (if this is a gcc bug) to be fixed for gcc 3.2.1 (last couple that worked was 2.2.5 / 3.1).
>How-To-Repeat:
I guess building libstdc++ would suffice.
>Fix:
Don't known if it is a regression from glibc 2.3. Maybe this bug report is not in the right place.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: