This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/8100: a valid operator definition is rejected.
- From: Christophe de Vienne <cdevienne at alphacent dot com>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 30 Sep 2002 21:06:05 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/8100: a valid operator definition is rejected.
- Reply-to: Christophe de Vienne <cdevienne at alphacent dot com>
The following reply was made to PR c++/8100; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Christophe de Vienne <cdevienne@alphacent.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
nobody@gcc.gnu.org, cdevienne@alphacent.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/8100: a valid operator definition is rejected.
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:09:48 +0200
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8100
Hi,
I'm the repoter of this (actualy not) bug.
After trying all most stupid things possible, it appeared that a
#include <ostream>
was missing (I couldn't imagine such a simple thing in a code from Pavel Krauz
but still).
Sorry to have created this useless bug report.
Cheers,
Christophe de Vienne