This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 8 Sep 2002 23:26:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
- Reply-to: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
The following reply was made to PR c++/7858; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: Peter Schmid <schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <bkoz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 19:24:18 -0400
Actually my argument is against using STLport because gcc now includes
a full c++ standard library there is no use for STLPort under gcc 3.3.
And it looks like you can get rid of the static cast and it should work.
I showed how to work around the "bug" in boost from the testcase.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski