This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/7515: invalid inlining
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- To: geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 7 Aug 2002 04:26:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: optimization/7515: invalid inlining
- Reply-to: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
The following reply was made to PR optimization/7515; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/7515: invalid inlining
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 21:17:05 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Geoff Keating wrote:
> This is not a bug unless -fpic is used, since executables themselves
> will not have any symbols overriden, correct?
This assumes clueful programmers. Often code for DSO are compiled
without -fpic. Sometimes it gets forgotten. Other times people believe
the "PIC register prevents optimization" myth. The text relocations
DSOs and up with having often go completely unnoticed.
So, no, -fpic is no prerequisite for this being a bug.
- --
- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE9UJ9H2ijCOnn/RHQRAiJwAKCgut+4fC4Zoq3VUC2a/knlBz/pRACggv8B
gg0/a/wOdwawFNE4IOxUseg=
=Mdrw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----