This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: ada/7208: build of gnatlib failed with SIGILL
- From: Adrian Knoth <adi at drcomp dot erfurt dot thur dot de>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 14 Jul 2002 10:06:03 -0000
- Subject: Re: ada/7208: build of gnatlib failed with SIGILL
- Reply-to: Adrian Knoth <adi at drcomp dot erfurt dot thur dot de>
The following reply was made to PR ada/7208; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adrian Knoth <adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: ada/7208: build of gnatlib failed with SIGILL
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:56:20 +0200
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:46:57AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Yes. I've tried it with the actual cvs co, here is the result, though
> > SIGILL changed to segfault:
> We need a GDB backtrace of the gnat1 process when it receives SIGILL,
> and a disassembly of the function corresponding to the topmost frame.
Is it ok for you if I'll send you a statically linked version of my xgcc
and the corefile? (to your personal address? I guess the gcc-list doesn't
want it)
I've now deleted everything, cvs co will follow and the static built, too.
I guess building without threads is easier for you to debug, isn't it?
--
mail: adi@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP: v2-key via keyserver
Ist die Katze schoen rund, freut sich der Hund!