This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++/7186: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator
- From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org, pcarlini at unitus dot it
- Date: 3 Jul 2002 16:22:57 -0000
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/7186: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator
- Reply-to: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org, pcarlini at unitus dot it, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->paolo
Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jul 3 09:22:56 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm going to give this to you...
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bkoz
State-Changed-When: Wed Jul 3 09:22:56 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Is there a survey of existing practice for this issue? Can all but the reverse_iterator bits go in now, since that will have ABI-impacting effects?
-benjamin
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7186