This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++/6553: 26_numerics/complex_inserters_extractors.cc fails in Tru64 UNIX V5.1
- From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
- Date: 29 May 2002 09:26:11 -0000
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/6553: 26_numerics/complex_inserters_extractors.cc fails in Tru64 UNIX V5.1
- Reply-to: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org, bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: 26_numerics/complex_inserters_extractors.cc fails in Tru64 UNIX V5.1
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->bkoz
Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 29 02:26:09 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Mine.
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bkoz
State-Changed-When: Wed May 29 02:26:09 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Hi! Hey, I think the fix to this is pretty simple:
libstdc++-v3/config/os/osf/osf5.0/bits/cpu_limits.h
has:
#define __glibcpp_long_bits 64
#define __glibcpp_long_double_bits 128
So, to get this working, don't you just have to add an OSF 4.0 config that doesn't have these defines?
Seems pretty simple, if this is it.
best,
benjamin
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6553