This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
c/6358: GCC 3.1 ICE on statement expressions
- From: gbeauchesne at mandrakesoft dot com
- To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: rth at redhat dot com, jakub at redhat dot com
- Date: 18 Apr 2002 13:44:53 -0000
- Subject: c/6358: GCC 3.1 ICE on statement expressions
- Reply-to: gbeauchesne at mandrakesoft dot com
>Number: 6358
>Category: c
>Synopsis: GCC 3.1 ICE on statement expressions
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: ice-on-legal-code
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Thu Apr 18 06:46:08 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Gwenole Beauchesne
>Release: GNU C version 3.1 20020418 (prerelease) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
>Organization:
>Environment:
i586-mandrake-linux-gnu
>Description:
gcc-3.1-branch ICEs on some statement expression returning void and enclosed in a function returning a value of floating type.
[gb@kernel gcc]$ ./cc1 ~/vrac/stmt_expr.c
f
/home/gb/vrac/stmt_expr.c: In function `f':
/home/gb/vrac/stmt_expr.c:7: Internal compiler error in subst_stack_regs_pat, at reg-stack.c:1441
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
>How-To-Repeat:
You can compile the following testcase with or without any optimazations. The testcase came up while distilling a similar ICE for ggv 1.99.3 (bonobo/ggv-postscript-view.c).
void g();
double f()
{
(void) ({ g(); return; });
return 0.0;
}
>Fix:
The ICE does not occur if either return; of the statement expression is omitted or the return value of f() is changed to some other scalar (non floating) type.
Besides, this is a regression from gcc-3.0.4.
BTW, as far as I can tell, the enclosed testcase succeeds with
GNU C version 3.1 20010617 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
but fails with:
GNU C version 3.1 20010715 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: