This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/3329: optimization large memory copies uses kern el memcpy function without user's knowledge.
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 2 Apr 2002 22:46:04 -0000
- Subject: Re: optimization/3329: optimization large memory copies uses kern el memcpy function without user's knowledge.
- Reply-to: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
The following reply was made to PR optimization/3329; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: "Araneda, Dorian" <dorian.araneda@intel.com>
Cc: "'Joseph S. Myers'" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>,
"'rth@gcc.gnu.org'" <rth@gcc.gnu.org>,
"'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
"'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: optimization/3329: optimization large memory copies uses kern el memcpy function without user's knowledge.
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 14:43:00 -0800
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:33:46PM -0800, Araneda, Dorian wrote:
> Is -ffrestanding a gcc argument?
Yes, but it doesn't do what you think.
"Freestanding" is a term used by the ISO C standard in
contrast with "hosted". There are more constraints on
"hosted" environments.
Please read the standard for complete details.
r~