This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 31 Mar 2002 00:36:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault
- Reply-to: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
The following reply was made to PR target/5851; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Stefaan De Roeck <stefaandr@hotmail.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:28:49 -0800
[ Please try to avoid sending html mail. It doesn't come out well once it
gets frobbed by gnats, and it gets black-holed by my spam filters. ]
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 12:16:01AM -0000, Stefaan De Roeck wrote:
> May I ask what version of binutils you use? With 2.9.1 I get some kind
> of "Unknown pseudo-op: '.section'" when assembling _muldi3.o, with the
> latest release or the cvs I get errors when compiling the assembler for
> alpha-vms. (I tried gcc-20020325, I hope that's what you meant with 3.1
> prerelease...)
Yes, that's what I meant by 3.1 prerelease.
As yet, I'm not using *any* version of binutils. If the compiler
itself is segfaulting (as you reported) I don't need to.
So: was the original problem a crash in the compiler or elsewhere?
r~