This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
libgcj/5789: boehm-gc won't build on irix (java testsuite results from irix 6.5)
- From: "Billinghurst, David \(CRTS\)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 28 Feb 2002 02:56:02 -0000
- Subject: libgcj/5789: boehm-gc won't build on irix (java testsuite results from irix 6.5)
- Reply-to: "Billinghurst, David \(CRTS\)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
The following reply was made to PR libgcj/5789; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:
Subject: libgcj/5789: boehm-gc won't build on irix (java testsuite results from irix 6.5)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:54:07 +0800
-----Original Message-----
From: Boehm, Hans [mailto:hans_boehm@hp.com]
Sent: Thursday, 28 February 2002 1:24=20
To: Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
Cc: 'java@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: RE: java testsuite results from irix 6.5=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
> - rename boehm-gc/mips_sgi_mach_dep.S to .s
Was that because a tool doesn't handle .S, or because a Makefile still
referred to it as .s?
The goal was to try to consistently rename all preprocessed asssembly =
files
to .S, a convention that gcc has long understood. Thus I would much =
rather
switch to a consistent use of .S, if that's possible.
Hans