This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: target/491: [ARM 4l] unrecognizable insn
- From: Phil Blundell <pb at nexus dot co dot uk>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 18 Jan 2002 18:26:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: target/491: [ARM 4l] unrecognizable insn
- Reply-to: Phil Blundell <pb at nexus dot co dot uk>
The following reply was made to PR target/491; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Phil Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Cc: pb@gcc.gnu.org, chris@cgnet.cx, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/491: [ARM 4l] unrecognizable insn
Date: 18 Jan 2002 18:20:30 +0000
On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 18:11, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > Bug confirmed to exist (indeed, positively notorious)
>
> I don't think this can occur in gcc-3.0 or later, since the way reload
> handles these sort of problems has been radically altered.
Okay, great. I'll have a go at re-testing it with 3.0.
What are we doing about bugs that are fixed in 3.0 and/or the trunk, but
still in 2.95? I guess there needs to come a time when keeping track of
2.95 bugs becomes more trouble than it's worth, but I dunno if that time
is now.
p.