This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap/4989: Bootstrap on Linux x86 fails.
- From: rodrigc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: apbianco at redhat dot com, rodrigc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, sefer at hotmail dot com
- Date: 2 Jan 2002 00:00:24 -0000
- Subject: Re: bootstrap/4989: Bootstrap on Linux x86 fails.
- Reply-to: rodrigc at gcc dot gnu dot org, apbianco at redhat dot com, rodrigc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, sefer at hotmail dot com, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: Bootstrap on Linux x86 fails.
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 1 16:00:23 2002
State-Changed-Why:
apbianco@redhat.com sent this e-mail out before,
but it looks like it got garbled and inserted into the
Fix section of this PR.
Are you still getting the same problem?
Can you follow these instructions and give us your feedback?
Thanks.
======
I haven't bootstrapped in a long time, but I would suspect
a lot of people are doing that on x86 (with all the language
support you're requesting.)
If this persists, you should send email to java@gcc.gnu.org,
since the Boehm GC is a part of the GCC Java runtime.
Note that the pre-processor might have changed recently
in order to be more compliant, although I couldn't find
evidences of it -- this error mode has been in effect for
a while.
So it could be a configuration problem where you end up
with an improperly #define'ed macro.
Could you try the same libtool invokation along with the
`-E' flag and post the results?
Thank you.
We'll see what really gets cpp upset.
======================================================
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4989