This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libgcj/1146
- To: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: libgcj/1146
- From: bryce at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Mar 2001 02:46:01 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: bryce at gcc dot gnu dot org
The following reply was made to PR libgcj/1146; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: bryce@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, tromey@cygnus.com, tromey@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: libgcj/1146
Date: 3 Mar 2001 02:44:12 -0000
Synopsis: ltdl modules never released
Responsible-Changed-From-To: java-hacker->tromey
Responsible-Changed-By: bryce
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Mar 2 18:44:12 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why:
.
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bryce
State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 2 18:44:12 2001
State-Changed-Why:
I reckon we should think of this as a feature and not a bug.
Implementing class GC of native code via dlclose() would
be very difficult and ugly, and of dubious benefit.
We certainly want to implement GC of interpreted/JITted
classes however...
what do you think, Tom?
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1146&database=gcc