This is the mail archive of the gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: c++/1579


The following reply was made to PR c++/1579; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Mike Doughney" <mike@mtd.com>
To: <rodrigc@mediaone.net>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: RE: c++/1579
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:44:16 -0500

 Go ahead and close it. I was able to correct the problem by changing the
 compiler options regarding memory allocation (don't remember the specifics
 since it's been awhile, but I might be able to locate them if you all think
 it might be of value). Thanks - mike
 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: rodrigc@mediaone.net [mailto:rodrigc@mediaone.net]
 > Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 7:15 PM
 > To: mike@mtd.com; gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org; nobody@gcc.gnu.org;
 > rodrigc@mediaone.net
 > Subject: Re: c++/1579
 >
 >
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1579&database=gcc
 >
 > Tested your preprocessed output file with:
 > gcc version 2.97 20010211 (experimental)
 > under i386 Linux.
 >
 > Lots of compiler warnings and some errors like:
 > sql_list.h: In member function `void List<T>::delete_elements() [with T
 > =   LEX_COLUMN]':
 > sql_acl.cc:2125:   instantiated from here
 > sql_list.h:196: no suitable `operator delete' for `LEX_COLUMN'
 >
 > No internal compiler errors occurred though.
 >
 > Should this report be closed?
 > --
 > Craig Rodrigues
 > http://www.gis.net/~craigr
 > rodrigc@mediaone.net
 >
 >
 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]