This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/1602
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: c++/1602
- From: Oleg Trott <ot14 at columbia dot edu>
- Date: 18 Feb 2001 00:06:00 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Oleg Trott <ot14 at columbia dot edu>
The following reply was made to PR c++/1602; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Oleg Trott <ot14@columbia.edu>
To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/1602
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:03:44 -0500 (EST)
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 06:46:59PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1602&database=gcc
> >
> > Don't know the workaround yet.
>
>
> OK, I compiled the following test case with -pedantic:
>
> #include <complex>
> int main(void){ return 0; }
>
> This compiled fine with no warnings/errors with:
> gcc version 2.97 20010211 (experimental)
> from: http://www.codesourcery.com/gcc-snapshots/
>
> This looks like a bug which has been fixed.
> Should this report be closed?
Frankly, I don't have gcc >= 2.96 around and I can't find my original bug
report. Just to make sure, since "complex" is a template, would you like
to compile something like
include <complex>
int main()
{
std::complex<double> c;
return 0;
}
with "-pedantic" switch?
Thanks
Oleg Trott http://www.columbia.edu/~ot14/
email: ot14@columbia.edu
Ph.D. Candidate
Columbia University phone: (212) 305-0257 (work)
Palmer Lab (NMR) fax : (212) 305-6949 (work)