This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: java/4776
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: java/4776
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: 13 Nov 2001 20:46:02 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
[Get raw message]
[Get raw message]
The following reply was made to PR java/4776; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org,
george.goffe@seagate.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: java/4776
Date: 13 Nov 2001 14:03:52 -0700
>>>>> "Craig" == Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net> writes:
Craig> PR 4776 looks a lot like PR 2812. You submitted a patch
Craig> which looks like it should have solved it, but according to this
Craig> PR, it is still a problem in gcc 3.0.2.
Craig> Any ideas?
I can't explain it. The patch is definitely there, and I believe it
was tested by a net user before it was committed.
Maybe a look at config.log would help.
It sounds like the gcc build is picking up the libiconv header file
but for some reason it isn't seeing the libiconv library.
Tom