This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
- From: Anton Ertl <anton at a0 dot complang dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Date: 23 Jul 2001 10:16:01 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Anton Ertl <anton at a0 dot complang dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
The following reply was made to PR c/2160; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Anton Ertl <anton@a0.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:12:53 +0200 (MET DST)
[This is a copy of a message already sent to
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org]
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> Feedback at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-06/msg01531.html
> (not sent to gcc-gnats, so not filed with this PR).
Should I do something else than replying to all recipients of your mail?
> Excess memory consumption is still a bug; changed from
> ice-on-legal-code to sw-bug.
I finally managed to compile this file on an Alpha with 1GB with
gcc-3.0 with
gcc -mieee -c engine.i
Top showed about 1550MB virtual memory consumption during most of the
time. Top showed that the CPU was mostly in system or idle mode, with
only about 0.5% user time; took about 30 hours. The compiler produced
a file engine.o, so I assume the compilation went ok (unfortunately I
was not smart enough to log the output and status).
- anton