This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap/3653: -fmessage-length=72 with g++ makes no sense
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: bootstrap/3653: -fmessage-length=72 with g++ makes no sense
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: 12 Jul 2001 19:56:00 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3653; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3653: -fmessage-length=72 with g++ makes no sense
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:54:57 -0400
> enrico.scholz@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de writes:
> | 3. The value of 72 is IMHO obsoleted. Are there still existing C++
> | programmers which are writing code on an 80-column console? I think most ones are using xterms or framebuffer-screens with 100 or more columns.
Many of us with xterms and framebuffer-screens still use 80 columns.
(Hint: pieces of paper cannot be stretched.)
--
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC