This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap/3653: -fmessage-length=72 with g++ makes no sense
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: bootstrap/3653: -fmessage-length=72 with g++ makes no sense
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
- Date: 12 Jul 2001 08:46:00 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3653; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
To: enrico.scholz@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3653: -fmessage-length=72 with g++ makes no sense
Date: 12 Jul 2001 10:40:49 +0200
enrico.scholz@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de writes:
| 1. It breaks existing tools. E.g. Emacs awaits a "<location>:<line>
| <error-msg>" format and gets confused by the current behavior
My personnal experience (yes, I write and compile my work under
Emacs) doesn't match your report. It just works fine.
| 3. The value of 72 is IMHO obsoleted. Are there still existing C++
| programmers which are writing code on an 80-column console? I think most ones are using xterms or framebuffer-screens with 100 or more columns.
We've through that debate over and over in the past. The default
value was what contented the majority which expressed their voices.
The exact value is configurable.
(And no, I'm not using an xterm)
| 4. Only the g++ frontend defaults to this linebreak. This is inconsequentlally.
That functionality was first implemented for g++. If you request it
to be available for other front-ends, I can undertsand that.
If you don't want the fonctionality, the documentation says you can
specify -fmessage-length=0
-- Gaby