This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/3628: "using std::rel_ops" blows up std::vector
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: c++/3628: "using std::rel_ops" blows up std::vector
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: 9 Jul 2001 21:36:01 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
The following reply was made to PR c++/3628; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
To: Richard.Kreckel@GiNaC.DE
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Joe Buck <jbuck@racerx.synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: c++/3628: "using std::rel_ops" blows up std::vector
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 17:27:41 -0400
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 08:50:34PM -0000, Richard.Kreckel@GiNaC.DE wrote:
> >Severity: serious
> >Priority: high
Priority high is reserved for maintainers. Please read the bug-reporting
instructions.
> using namespace std;
> using namespace std::rel_ops;
[...]
> Q: Does this qulify as a regression? After all in gcc-2.95 there was no
> such thing as namespace rel_ops and the applications worked fine.
In 2.95 you could not write "using namespace std::rel_ops" in the first place.
Phil
--
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC