This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap/3236
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: bootstrap/3236
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>
- Date: 20 Jun 2001 18:26:03 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3236; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw@Stanford.EDU>
To: Jeff Deifik <jeff.deifik@jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: Jeff Deifik <jdeifik@weasel.com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>,
gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3236
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:20:48 -0700
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:03:05AM -0700, Jeff Deifik wrote:
> At 10:46 AM 6/20/01 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:14:28AM -0700, Jeff Deifik wrote:
> > >
> > > This is jeff deifik (from my home domain).
> > >
> > > I was able to successfully build gcc-3.0 by building in the
> > > gcc-3.0 tree. I know you folks said not to do it, but someone else
> > > at work did it successfully, and I was at wits end due to the
> > > make bootstrap bug I reported.
> >
> >srcdir == objdir is supposed to work. We just don't test it very
> >often.
> >
> >What doesn't work at all is when srcdir is a parent of objdir or vice
> >versa.
>
> I really appreciate all of your help. When it wasn't working for me, neither
> srcdir nor objdir was a parent of the other.
>
> I had ~jdeifik/gnu/gcc-3.0/... where the source was and I had
> ~jdeifik/gnu/objdir . That is what I reported in the bug report.
Yes, I understood that. Did you try my original suggestion?
--
zw The phrase causes storage to be reserved, doesn't mean that it causes
storage to be reserved. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of
Standardese.
-- Mike Stump