This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap/3147: arm-elf and arm-rtems unbuildable on 3.0 branch
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: bootstrap/3147: arm-elf and arm-rtems unbuildable on 3.0 branch
- From: Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
- Date: 13 Jun 2001 07:36:01 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3147; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: joel@OARcorp.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3147: arm-elf and arm-rtems unbuildable on 3.0 branch
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:31:10 +0100
--==_Exmh_104880588P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>/tmp/ccNuRMlh.s:31: Error: bad instruction `adds r4,lr,r4'
>/tmp/ccNuRMlh.s:32: Error: bad instruction `addcs r7,r7,#65536'
Strange - you seem to be getting ARM code despite the `-mthumb' option. I'll
investigate this later today if nobody beats me to it.
>Unknown. I suspect that using binutils 2.11 rather than 2.10
>might get around this. But generally binutils 2.11 is broken
>on other platforms that have RTEMS targets so it is not in use
>yet.
Please try the binutils-2.11.1pre1 archive I made the other day and see if
that fixes your problems with 2.11.
p.
--==_Exmh_104880588P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian)
iD8DBQE7Jxa+VTLPJe9CT30RAhCXAKCwzYfcHwLdfBni/7mXbPuBRQxRswCggiZ9
V+9loSKSlAJ0Hx6Ew6O2Apc=
=7dRc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_104880588P--