This is the mail archive of the gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: libstdc++/3016: stl_queue.h bugs wrt compliance


The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3016; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
To: brendan@zen.org
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3016: stl_queue.h bugs wrt compliance
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:49:10 -0400

 On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:50:54PM -0000, brendan@zen.org wrote:
 > *************** protected:
 > *** 76,81 ****
 >     _Sequence c;
 >   public:
 > !   queue() : c() {}
 > !   explicit queue(const _Sequence& __c) : c(__c) {}
 >   
 >     bool empty() const { return c.empty(); }
 > --- 76,80 ----
 >     _Sequence c;
 >   public:
 > !   explicit queue(const _Sequence& __c = _Sequence()) : c(__c) {}
 >   
 >     bool empty() const { return c.empty(); }
 
 I disagree with removing the copy ctor.  Just because it isn't
 mandated doesn't mean it isn't allowed.  What if I wished to construct
 a vector-of-queue-of-T?  Queue wouldn't meet the copy-constructible
 requirement.
 
 Phil
 
 -- 
 pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
 devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
 The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]