This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/2014
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: c++/2014
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Date: 29 May 2001 07:56:01 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
The following reply was made to PR c++/2014; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <george.goffe@seagate.com>
Subject: Re: c++/2014
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 08:54:06 +0100 (BST)
On 29 May 2001 rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> Subject: Re: c++/2014
> Date: 29 May 2001 01:32:14 -0000
>
> Synopsis: error in print_rtl_and_abort, at flow.c:6592
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: rodrigc
> State-Changed-When: Mon May 28 18:32:14 2001
> State-Changed-Why:
> Don't bootstrap with -O7
Why exactly is an ICE not a bug, just because it requires -O7 to show up?
If -O7 was used with the already installed compiler to bootstrap, that
might be a problem - but providing the installed compiler builds the
stage1 compiler without optimisation, the subsequent bootstrap stages
should work fine with -O7, and there's a compiler bug present if they
don't.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk