This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++/2568
- To: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/2568
- From: Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- Date: 25 May 2001 19:46:04 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/2568; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Brad Lucier <lucier@math.purdue.edu>
Cc: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com,
neil@gcc.gnu.org, amacleod@cygnus.com (Andrew Macleod)
Subject: Re: libstdc++/2568
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 21:42:44 +0200 (MEST)
Brad Lucier writes:
> > * a sparc-sun-solaris2.8 configuration (sparcv7),
>
> I just did one of these today, and I started a sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
> with (I believe) multilib support that should finish in a few
sparc-sun-solaris2.8 is bootstrap and check are finished,
sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap is done, check is well along, I'm waiting
for this to finish before I start the -m32 check.
> hours. (The bootstrap is fairly fast, it's the make check
> that kills me.)
Bootstrap is generally ok on an 2 x 400 MHz E250, although the bootstrap
takes considerably longer for sparcv9 (even up to the make compare), It's
obvious that building all libraries twice takes longer :-)
Rainer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
Email: ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE