This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/2751
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: c/2751
- From: Bruce Korb <bkorb at pacbell dot net>
- Date: 19 May 2001 23:36:00 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Bruce Korb <bkorb at pacbell dot net>
The following reply was made to PR c/2751; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bruce Korb <bkorb@pacbell.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, mtodorov@alu.hr
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/2751
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 16:33:37 -0700
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2751&database=gcc
It would seem to me that either va-alpha.h or va_list.h should be
defining the thing, not both. Please send me four files for
analysis:
/usr/include/va-alpha.h
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-dec-osf4.0b/2.95.3/include/va-alpha.h
/usr/include/va_list.h
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-dec-osf4.0b/2.95.3/include/va_list.h
then we can try to see the best way to obliterate one of the defs.