This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/1094
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: c++/1094
- From: Dave Finnegan <dfinnegan at synchronicity dot com>
- Date: 3 May 2001 17:56:00 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Dave Finnegan <dfinnegan at synchronicity dot com>
The following reply was made to PR c++/1094; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dave Finnegan <dfinnegan@synchronicity.com>
To: jdennett@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, dave@syncinc.com
Subject: Re: c++/1094
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 13:51:43 -0400
Whoa! A blast from the past!
I have long since given up on Red Hat.
Cheers,
Dave
James Dennett wrote:
> Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1094&database=gcc
>
> I've just built a current POSE with a recent gcc (2001-05-02) on
> Linux/x86, and apart from numerous coding errors in POSE I found no
> problems with the compiler. Preprocessed source showing your problem
> would still be helpful, as anything which makes gcc crash is important.
> It would also be nice to know which version of gcc you found the problem
> with; note that RedHat 7.0 ships with an unofficial version of gcc which
> is not supported by the FSF.
>
> Note that without access to the exact source code which caused your
> problem (preferably in pre-processed form) there is almost no chance of
> a gcc developer being able to reproduce your problem. We/they would
> love to investigate this, but cannot go any further without more
> information.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html gives some more information
> which may help.
>
> We (I!) would appreciate it if you are able to provide more information.
>
> Regards,
>
> James Dennett
--
Dave Finnegan Synchronicity, Inc.
845.986.6121 dave@synchronicity.com