This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/2678: gcc/g++ should stick compilation options into the .o file
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: c/2678: gcc/g++ should stick compilation options into the .o file
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: 29 Apr 2001 12:46:01 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
The following reply was made to PR c/2678; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/2678: gcc/g++ should stick compilation options into the .o file
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 07:20:29 -0400
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:26:53PM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2001, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > I think that's .ident, not .comment. (Was ".command" a typo for ".comment"?)
>
> .ident assembler directives put data in .comment.
Duh... this is what happens when I post without sleep.
> Since the original message mentioned both .comment and .command, I think
> .command did mean .comment.
Pity, a .command section would've been useful for this.
--
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.