This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fwd: Re: other/823: gcc -U does not undef a macro
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: other/823: gcc -U does not undef a macro
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Date: 27 Nov 2000 21:16:00 -0000
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Reply-To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
The following reply was made to PR other/823; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw@Stanford.EDU>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: other/823: gcc -U does not undef a macro
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 21:13:24 +0000
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:38:44PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > Zack,
> >
> > This bounced for your old address; so you may not have seen it.
>
> I did not.
>
> I don't know what the problem is, but I'll bet you it's the specs
> reordering -D and -U options. There is presently no way to ask for
> "all the -D and -U options, in the same relative order that they
> appeared on the command line."
Indeed. But the order was changed by a checkin you made, but there seems
to have been no reason for this change cited.
What was the reason for changing it?
R.