This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Чт, ноя 14, 2019 at 16:57, Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:Though, this wouldn't be equivalent to what new people, who just want to call `debug()` with the arg, would expect :) If you want to deduplicate thefunction call, I can reorganize the code to be like this: define pp if ($argc == 0) set $arg = $ else set $arg = $arg0 end call debug ($arg) endI wish there was a less verbose way :) I don't insist on this deduplication, so at this point I guess it's up to the reviewers. Your suggestion seems slightly preferable to duplicating commands, but please wait for feedback from others.
Sure; you know, actually I just found out how we can deduplicate the code! Can we use this or not depends on whether we can tolerate dependency on python (I dunno, I can ‾\_(ツ)_/‾). The code:
py def choose_arg0_into_gdbarg(): if gdb.execute('output $argc', to_string=True) == '1': gdb.execute('set debug_arg = $arg0', to_string=True) else: gdb.execute('set debug_arg = $', to_string=True) end define pp py choose_arg0_into_gdbarg() call debug (debug_arg) endI also named `dbgarg` as `debug_arg` because I figured I confuse whether it was `gdbarg` or `gdbarg` :D
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |