This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Free ipa-prop edge summaries for inline calls


> On 11/12/19 11:07 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Since ipa_node_params_sum->get might be a bit too long, perhaps we could
> > use ipcp_node_sum->get or something similar.  And similarly for edges.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> I'm for the suggested change!

Yes, I like it too (and was about to suggest it).  I ould hold it until
the jump function revamp gets into mainline. Lets discuss proper names
for the summaries tomorrow.  In general I sort of consideer use of
"node" in meaning of function a mistake from time callgraph was just a
callgraph.  Also the summary is not ipcp only, so perhaps something
like ipa_function_params_sum but that is long again.

Honza
> 
> Martin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]