This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC 10.0 Status Report (2019-10-22), Stage 1 to end Nov 16th


On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:31:07AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/1/19 9:08 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 04:01:12PM +0100, Romain Geissler wrote:
> >> Le mar. 22 oct. 2019 à 14:53, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Please make sure to get features intended for GCC 10 finished
> >>> and reviewed before the end of stage 1.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I understand my question comes very (most likely too) late, but are
> >> there any plans to switch the default C++ dialect to -std=gnu++17 when
> >> invoking g++ ? C++17 support in gcc is now quite complete, has been
> >> out tested by some users since gcc 8, so shall it be switched on by
> >> default in gcc 10 ? Or gcc 11 ? However I fear doing that may break
> >> some tests in the testsuite, I hope not too many.
> > 
> > I plan to propose a switch to -std=gnu++17 in GCC 11.  I think it's way
> > too late for GCC 10.
> > 
> > Dealing with the testsuite fallout, and rebuilding Fedora packages is
> > of course part of that switch.
> FWIW, we *could* do the rebuild test, we've got time for that.  What's
> far more interesting would be dealing with the fallout ;-)

I most definitely had your tester in mind ;).

> I'd tend to agree though, flip the default as soon as gcc-11 stage1
> opens.  That gives us plenty of time to deal with any fallout.

Sounds like we have a plan.

--
Marek Polacek • Red Hat, Inc. • 300 A St, Boston, MA


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]