This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] [LRA] Fix wrong-code PR 91109 take 2


Hi,

as discussed in the PR 91109 audit trail,
my previous patch missed a case where no spilling is necessary,
but the re-materialized instruction has now scratch regs without
a hard register assignment.  And thus the LRA pass falls out of
the loop pre-maturely.

Fixed by checking for scratch regs with no assignment
and continuing the loop in that case.


Boot-strapped and reg-tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabihf.
Is it OK for trunk?


Thanks
Bernd.
2019-08-12  Bernd Edlinger  <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>

	PR tree-optimization/91109
	* lra-int.h (lra_need_for_scratch_reg_p): Declare.
	* lra.c (lra): Use lra_need_for_scratch_reg_p.
	* lra-spills.c (lra_need_for_scratch_reg_p): New function.

Index: gcc/lra-int.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/lra-int.h	(revision 274168)
+++ gcc/lra-int.h	(working copy)
@@ -396,6 +396,7 @@ extern bool lra_coalesce (void);
 
 /* lra-spills.c:  */
 
+extern bool lra_need_for_scratch_reg_p (void);
 extern bool lra_need_for_spills_p (void);
 extern void lra_spill (void);
 extern void lra_final_code_change (void);
Index: gcc/lra-spills.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/lra-spills.c	(revision 274168)
+++ gcc/lra-spills.c	(working copy)
@@ -549,6 +549,19 @@ spill_pseudos (void)
     }
 }
 
+/* Return true if we need scratch reg assignments.  */
+bool
+lra_need_for_scratch_reg_p (void)
+{
+  int i; max_regno = max_reg_num ();
+
+  for (i = FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; i < max_regno; i++)
+    if (lra_reg_info[i].nrefs != 0 && lra_get_regno_hard_regno (i) < 0
+	&& lra_former_scratch_p (i))
+      return true;
+  return false;
+}
+
 /* Return true if we need to change some pseudos into memory.  */
 bool
 lra_need_for_spills_p (void)
Index: gcc/lra.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/lra.c	(revision 274168)
+++ gcc/lra.c	(working copy)
@@ -2567,7 +2567,11 @@ lra (FILE *f)
 	  lra_create_live_ranges (lra_reg_spill_p, true);
 	  live_p = true;
 	  if (! lra_need_for_spills_p ())
-	    break;
+	    {
+	      if (lra_need_for_scratch_reg_p ())
+		continue;
+	      break;
+	    }
 	}
       lra_spill ();
       /* Assignment of stack slots changes elimination offsets for

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]