This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: types for VR_VARYING
On 8/14/19 9:50 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 8/13/19 8:39 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Yes, it was 2X.
I noticed that Richi made some changes to the lattice handling for
VARYING while the discussion was on-going. I missed these, and had
failed to adapt the patch for it. I would appreciate a final review
of the attached patch, especially the vr-values.c changes, which I
have modified to play nice with current trunk.
I also noticed that Andrew's patch was setting num_vr_values to
num_ssa_names + num_ssa_names / 10. I think he meant num_vr_values +
num_vr_values / 10. Please verify the current incantation makes sense.
no, I meant num_ssa_names. We are resizing the vector because
num_vr_values is out of date (and smaller than num_ssa_names is now), so
we need to resize the vector to be at least the number of ssa-names...
and I added 10% just in case we arent done adding new ones.
if num_vr_values is 100, and we've added 200 ssa-names, num_ssa_names
would now be 300. if you resize based on num_vr_values, you could
still go off the end of the vector.
OK, I've changed the resize to allocate 2X as well. So now we'll have:
+ unsigned int old_sz = num_vr_values;
+ num_vr_values = num_ssa_names * 2;
+ vr_value = XRESIZEVEC (value_range *, vr_value, num_vr_values);
etc
And the original allocation will also be 2X.
Aldy