This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix aarch64_compare_and_swap* constraints (PR target/87839)


Hi Jakub,

On 13/11/18 09:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!

The following testcase ICEs because the predicate and constraints on one of
the operands of @aarch64_compare_and_swapdi aren't consistent.  The RA which
goes according to constraints
(insn 15 13 16 2 (set (reg:DI 104)
        (const_int 8589934595 [0x200000003])) "pr87839.c":15:3 47 {*movdi_aarch64}
     (expr_list:REG_EQUIV (const_int 8589934595 [0x200000003])
        (nil)))
(insn 16 15 21 2 (parallel [
            (set (reg:CC 66 cc)
                (unspec_volatile:CC [
                        (const_int 0 [0])
                    ] UNSPECV_ATOMIC_CMPSW))
            (set (reg:DI 101)
                (mem/v:DI (reg/f:DI 99) [-1  S8 A64]))
            (set (mem/v:DI (reg/f:DI 99) [-1  S8 A64])
                (unspec_volatile:DI [
                        (reg:DI 104)
                        (reg:DI 103)
                        (const_int 0 [0])
                        (const_int 32773 [0x8005]) repeated x2
                    ] UNSPECV_ATOMIC_CMPSW))
            (clobber (scratch:SI))
        ]) "pr87839.c":15:3 3532 {aarch64_compare_and_swapdi}
     (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:DI 101)
        (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 66 cc)
            (nil))))
when seeing n constraint puts the 0x200000003 constant directly into the
atomic instruction, but the predicate requires that it is either a register,
or shifted positive or negative 12-bit constant and so it fails to split.
The positive shifted constant apparently has I constraint and negative one
J, and other uses of aarch64_plus_operand that have some constraint use
rIJ (or r):
config/aarch64/aarch64.md: (match_operand:GPI 2 "aarch64_plus_operand" "r,I,J"))
config/aarch64/aarch64.md:                (match_operand:SI 2 "aarch64_plus_operand" "r,I,J"))
config/aarch64/aarch64.md: (match_operand:GPI 1 "aarch64_plus_operand" "r,I,J"))
config/aarch64/aarch64.md: (match_operand:GPI 1 "aarch64_plus_operand" "r"))
config/aarch64/aarch64.md: (match_operand:GPI 1 "aarch64_plus_operand" "r,I,J")))]

I don't have a setup to easily bootstrap/regtest aarch64-linux ATM, could
somebody please include it in their bootstrap/regtest? Thanks.

2018-11-13  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

        PR target/87839
        * config/aarch64/atomics.md (@aarch64_compare_and_swap<mode>): Use
        rIJ constraint for aarch64_plus_operand rather than rn.

        * gcc.target/aarch64/pr87839.c: New test.


This passes bootstrap and regtesting shows no problems on aarch64-none-linux-gnu.
The change looks good to me but you'll still need maintainer approval.

Thanks,
Kyrill

--- gcc/config/aarch64/atomics.md.jj    2018-11-01 12:06:43.469963662 +0100
+++ gcc/config/aarch64/atomics.md       2018-11-13 09:59:35.660185116 +0100
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ (define_insn_and_split "@aarch64_compare
     (match_operand:GPI 1 "aarch64_sync_memory_operand" "+Q"))   ;; memory
    (set (match_dup 1)
     (unspec_volatile:GPI
-      [(match_operand:GPI 2 "aarch64_plus_operand" "rn")       ;; expect
+      [(match_operand:GPI 2 "aarch64_plus_operand" "rIJ")      ;; expect
        (match_operand:GPI 3 "aarch64_reg_or_zero" "rZ")                ;; desired
        (match_operand:SI 4 "const_int_operand")                        ;; is_weak
        (match_operand:SI 5 "const_int_operand")                        ;; mod_s
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr87839.c.jj 2018-11-13 10:13:44.353309416 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr87839.c  2018-11-13 10:13:05.496944699 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/* PR target/87839 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -w" } */
+
+long long b[64];
+void foo (void);
+int bar (void (*) (void));
+void qux (long long *, long long) __attribute__((noreturn));
+void quux (long long *, long long);
+
+void
+baz (void)
+{
+  __sync_val_compare_and_swap (b, 4294967298LL, 78187493520LL);
+  __sync_bool_compare_and_swap (b + 1, 8589934595LL, 21474836489LL);
+  __sync_fetch_and_xor (b, 60129542145LL);
+  quux (b, 42949672967LL);
+  __sync_xor_and_fetch (b + 22, 60129542145LL);
+  quux (b + 23, 42949672967LL);
+  if (bar (baz))
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  foo ();
+  __sync_val_compare_and_swap (b, 4294967298LL, 0);
+  __sync_bool_compare_and_swap (b + 1, 8589934595LL, 78187493520LL);
+  if (__sync_or_and_fetch (b, 21474836489LL) != 21474836489LL)
+    qux (b + 22, 60129542145LL);
+  __atomic_fetch_nand (b + 23, 42949672967LL, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+  bar (baz);
+}

        Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]