This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Default to an ARM cpu that exists

From: coypu at sdf dot org
To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:36:34 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Default to an ARM cpu that exists
References: <20181021045317.GA18038@SDF.ORG> <9cb45c8f-adf9-16a4-6fa8-64f7174d55db@arm.com>

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 03:56:24PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> I think strongarm would be a better choice.  I'm not aware of anyone
> running NetBSD on Arm8 cpus.

Clarifying: this is the global default for all GCC ARM targets,
not just netbsd. Is strongarm still the preferred choice?

Thanks.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Default to an ARM cpu that exists
  - From: Richard Earnshaw (lists)

References:
- [PATCH] Default to an ARM cpu that exists
  - From: coypu
- Re: [PATCH] Default to an ARM cpu that exists
  - From: Richard Earnshaw (lists)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]