This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, LRA] Never reload fixed form constraints memory operand

From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
To: Thomas Preudhomme <thomas dot preudhomme at linaro dot org>, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:35:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH, LRA] Never reload fixed form constraints memory operand
References: <CAKnkMGvXi16uEfXRfHe2WPHkoCMLsoCBmHm8op=FmAHcN3nLkg@mail.gmail.com> <d2003305-d94a-86e0-8eda-6a06bc6e39da@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOqQXPdOgsjsD=TQ8EAK9YTLAH_DNgO87vFKzNn4mWMtdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKnkMGtojtSbDWt9b6UTczf-QBhtZeQC9Ys4WjOZBBcNiMNN9A@mail.gmail.com>



On 10/04/2018 08:27 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:

My bad, I used dg-cmp-results without verbosity which didn't show the
problem It starts to show it with -v -v, I'm not sure why. I'll have a
look right now and revert by the end of today if I cannot come up with
a fix. Does that sound ok?

Yes, that is ok. It is pretty normal situation with LRA bugs. Sometimesa fix needs several iterations as one person can not test all the targets.

References:
- [PATCH, LRA] Never reload fixed form constraints memory operand
  - From: Thomas Preudhomme
- Re: [PATCH, LRA] Never reload fixed form constraints memory operand
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: [PATCH, LRA] Never reload fixed form constraints memory operand
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH, LRA] Never reload fixed form constraints memory operand
  - From: Thomas Preudhomme

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]