This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors


On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:30:58AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 24/05/18 18:28, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:07:18AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >> On 22/05/18 22:21, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>> On 05/21/2018 03:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>>> This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all
> >>>> architectures, similar to ilp32 and lp64.
> > 
> >>>> 2017-05-21  Segher Boessenkool  <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
> >>>>
> >>>> gcc/testsuite/
> >>>> 	* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_be): New.
> >>>> 	(check_effective_target_le): New.
> >>> I think this is fine.  "be" "le" are used all over the place in gcc and
> >>> the kernel to denote big/little endian.
> >>
> >> except when el and eb are used for perversity... :-)
> > 
> > It should have been -BE and -EL, because that is what it means.  That
> > also avoids the -l/-L problem -le and -LE would have ;-)
> > 
> > (Confusing?  Yes, little-endian is confusing).
> 
> I beg to differ.  Big endian is the confusing one... :-)

I thought you said -EL is perverse.  Maybe I misunderstood!

(Sorry sorry).


Segher


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]