This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce prefetch-minimum stride option


On 05/23/2018 04:50 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 05/23/2018 07:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:41 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:35 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry. Does the following fix it for i686?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (revision 260625)
>>>> +++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (working copy)
>>>> @@ -1014,7 +1014,8 @@
>>>>    fprintf (dump_file,
>>>>    "Step for reference %u:%u (%ld) is less than the mininum "
>>>>                                                ^^^ Please use
>>>> HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC
>>>>    "required stride of %d\n",
>>>> - ref->group->uid, ref->uid, int_cst_value (ref->group->step),
>>>> + ref->group->uid, ref->uid,
>>>> + (HOST_WIDE_INT) int_cst_value (ref->group->step),
>>>>    PREFETCH_MINIMUM_STRIDE);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Something like this.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> H.J.
>>> ---
>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>>> index c3e7fd1e529..949a67f360e 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>>> @@ -1012,8 +1012,8 @@ should_issue_prefetch_p (struct mem_ref *ref)
>>>       {
>>>         if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>>>     fprintf (dump_file,
>>> -      "Step for reference %u:%u (%ld) is less than the mininum "
>>> -      "required stride of %d\n",
>>> +      "Step for reference %u:%u (" HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_C
>>> +      ") is less than the mininum required stride of %d\n",
>>>         ref->group->uid, ref->uid, int_cst_value (ref->group->step),
>>>         PREFETCH_MINIMUM_STRIDE);
>>>         return false;
>>
>> I meant:
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>> index c3e7fd1e529..e34b78dc186 100644
>> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>> @@ -1012,8 +1012,8 @@ should_issue_prefetch_p (struct mem_ref *ref)
>>       {
>>         if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>>     fprintf (dump_file,
>> -      "Step for reference %u:%u (%ld) is less than the mininum "
>> -      "required stride of %d\n",
>> +      "Step for reference %u:%u (" HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC
>> +      ") is less than the mininum required stride of %d\n",
>>         ref->group->uid, ref->uid, int_cst_value (ref->group->step),
>>         PREFETCH_MINIMUM_STRIDE);
>>         return false;
>>
>>
> 
> Pushed now. Sorry for the breakage.
> 
> For future reference, is there an i686 system on the gcc farm that i can
> use to validate this?
My tester uses gcc45.  In theory you could probably also do it in an
i686 chroot on an x86_64 system.  My tester does that for testing ppc32
on a ppc64 system.

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]