This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce prefetch-minimum stride option
On 05/23/2018 04:50 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 05/23/2018 07:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:41 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:35 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry. Does the following fix it for i686?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (revision 260625)
>>>> +++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (working copy)
>>>> @@ -1014,7 +1014,8 @@
>>>> fprintf (dump_file,
>>>> "Step for reference %u:%u (%ld) is less than the mininum "
>>>> ^^^ Please use
>>>> HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC
>>>> "required stride of %d\n",
>>>> - ref->group->uid, ref->uid, int_cst_value (ref->group->step),
>>>> + ref->group->uid, ref->uid,
>>>> + (HOST_WIDE_INT) int_cst_value (ref->group->step),
>>>> PREFETCH_MINIMUM_STRIDE);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Something like this.
>>>
>>> --
>>> H.J.
>>> ---
>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>>> index c3e7fd1e529..949a67f360e 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>>> @@ -1012,8 +1012,8 @@ should_issue_prefetch_p (struct mem_ref *ref)
>>> {
>>> if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>>> fprintf (dump_file,
>>> - "Step for reference %u:%u (%ld) is less than the mininum "
>>> - "required stride of %d\n",
>>> + "Step for reference %u:%u (" HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_C
>>> + ") is less than the mininum required stride of %d\n",
>>> ref->group->uid, ref->uid, int_cst_value (ref->group->step),
>>> PREFETCH_MINIMUM_STRIDE);
>>> return false;
>>
>> I meant:
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>> index c3e7fd1e529..e34b78dc186 100644
>> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>> @@ -1012,8 +1012,8 @@ should_issue_prefetch_p (struct mem_ref *ref)
>> {
>> if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>> fprintf (dump_file,
>> - "Step for reference %u:%u (%ld) is less than the mininum "
>> - "required stride of %d\n",
>> + "Step for reference %u:%u (" HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC
>> + ") is less than the mininum required stride of %d\n",
>> ref->group->uid, ref->uid, int_cst_value (ref->group->step),
>> PREFETCH_MINIMUM_STRIDE);
>> return false;
>>
>>
>
> Pushed now. Sorry for the breakage.
>
> For future reference, is there an i686 system on the gcc farm that i can
> use to validate this?
My tester uses gcc45. In theory you could probably also do it in an
i686 chroot on an x86_64 system. My tester does that for testing ppc32
on a ppc64 system.
jeff