This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 84588 ("[8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (contains_struct_check())")​ (Take 2)

Hi,

On 17/05/2018 16:58, Jason Merrill wrote:

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Paolo Carlini
<paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:

PS: maybe better using function_declarator_p?

I think so, yes.  The relevant rule seems to be "The declarator shall
not specify a function or an array.", so let's check for arrays, too.
Agreed. I had the amended patch ready when I noticed (again) that it wasn't addressing another related class of issues which involves declarators not followed by initializers. Thus I tried to fix those too, and the below which moves the check up appears to work fine, passes testing, etc. Are there any risks that an erroneous function / array as declarator is in fact a well formed expression?!? I haven't been able so far to construct examples... 

Thanks!
Paolo.

////////////////////////

Attachment: patch_84588_7
Description: Text document

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]