This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Set SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS

From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
To: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco dot Dijkstra at arm dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, James Greenhalgh <James dot Greenhalgh at arm dot com>
Cc: nd <nd at arm dot com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 14:48:52 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Set SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS
References: <DB6PR0801MB20538090D623425906F46EDA832F0@DB6PR0801MB2053.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <DB5PR08MB10308A9775929F34D6A5227C83930@DB5PR08MB1030.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <f3adbcbb-33f3-158f-9afe-6a33b130c3ff@arm.com> <DB5PR08MB103028356C71A126604C46B183930@DB5PR08MB1030.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <994f06e9-1610-73fb-d2db-56c98df7c526@arm.com> <DB5PR08MB10300CEB6004E22D35DC6FCE83930@DB5PR08MB1030.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On 15/05/18 17:58, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> Which doesn't appear to have been approved.  Did you follow up with Jeff?
> 
> I'll get back to that one at some point - it'll take some time to agree on a way
> forward with the callback.
> 
> Wilco
>     
> 

So it seems to me that this should then be queued until that is resolved.

R.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Set SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS
  - From: Wilco Dijkstra

References:
- Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Set SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS
  - From: Wilco Dijkstra
- Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Set SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS
  - From: Richard Earnshaw (lists)
- Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Set SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS
  - From: Wilco Dijkstra
- Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Set SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS
  - From: Richard Earnshaw (lists)
- Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Set SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS
  - From: Wilco Dijkstra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]