This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Handle no_sanitize attribute values in the right way (PR sanitizer/85556).
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Martin Liška <mliska at suse dot cz>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 11:45:56 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle no_sanitize attribute values in the right way (PR sanitizer/85556).
- References: <9beeb4c0-d059-ac6f-83a6-2e3669f34746@suse.cz>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:28:15AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Parsing of no_sanitize attribute now supports
> __attribute__((no_sanitize("address,undefined")))
Why is that wrong? I don't see why we shouldn't support it that way.
It matches how we handle other similar attributes, say target attribute.
> which is wrong. And on the other hand this is not recognized:
> __attribute__((no_sanitize("address", "undefined")))
But we can certainly add support for this too for compatibility with clang.
Jakub