This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libffi PowerPC64 ELFv1 fp arg fixes

From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 23:04:54 +0930
Subject: Re: libffi PowerPC64 ELFv1 fp arg fixes
References: <20180504101020.GI28782@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20180504110227.GT14117@gate.crashing.org>

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 06:02:27AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:40:20PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > The attached patch has been accepted into upstream libffi.  It fixes
> > powerpc64-linux problems shown up by Bruno Haible's new libffi
> > testsuite tests.  Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux
> > and powerpc64le-linux.  OK mainline and active branches?
> 
> That looks fine, and since it is in upstream it counts as obvious I
> think?
> 
> Is there a test for this, btw?

https://github.com/libffi/libffi/tree/master/testsuite/libffi.bhaible
I'm guessing this could be imported but I'm not sure of the politics.

powerpc64 failed test-call.c DGTEST=12, DGTEST=13, DGTEST=55,
DGTEST=56, DGTEST=57 and DGTEST=68, and corresponding tests in
test-callback.c.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

References:
- libffi PowerPC64 ELFv1 fp arg fixes
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: libffi PowerPC64 ELFv1 fp arg fixes
  - From: Segher Boessenkool

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]